Discussion:
R.I.P.: H.W. McElroy
(too old to reply)
Jackie McElroy
2005-04-16 00:48:22 UTC
Permalink
In Memorium
Hugh Walter McElroy
Born: October 28, 1874
Died: April 15, 1912
Chief Purser
R.M.S. Titanic
-jackie

Jackie McElroy
Washington, D.C.
http://www.mcjackie.com
Jackie McElroy
2005-04-22 23:46:34 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 00:48:22 GMT,
Post by Jackie McElroy
In Memorium
Hugh Walter McElroy
Born: October 28, 1874
Died: April 15, 1912
Chief Purser
R.M.S. Titanic
Well, the anniversary of the sinking came and went with nothinbg
posted but this. Now tons of spam. Guess that signals the total demise
of this newsgroup. I'be been here since it started backj in 1996. Had
some good discussions here. Thanks for that. Guess it's now R.I.P
a.m.t....

so long
-jackie

Jackie McElroy
Washington, D.C.
http://www.mcjackie.com
Joe Sweeney
2005-04-23 02:26:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jackie McElroy
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 00:48:22 GMT,
Post by Jackie McElroy
In Memorium
Hugh Walter McElroy
Born: October 28, 1874
Died: April 15, 1912
Chief Purser
R.M.S. Titanic
Well, the anniversary of the sinking came and went with nothinbg
posted but this. Now tons of spam. Guess that signals the total demise
of this newsgroup. I'be been here since it started backj in 1996. Had
some good discussions here. Thanks for that. Guess it's now R.I.P
a.m.t....
so long
-jackie
Jackie McElroy
Washington, D.C.
http://www.mcjackie.com
I think you mean '97 :)

I've been here about that long too and I still check for new messages
every day. I'll probably leave it on my list just in case any other old
timers speak up. It sure was fun while it lasted...FrankMan, mouse, Tom,
Janelle, Cory...see you around the intarwebs :)
Bill Leary
2005-04-23 11:32:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Joe Sweeney
Post by Jackie McElroy
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 00:48:22 GMT,
((..omitted..))
Well, the anniversary of the sinking came and went with nothinbg
posted but this. Now tons of spam. Guess that signals the total demise
of this newsgroup. I'be been here since it started backj in 1996. Had
some good discussions here. Thanks for that. Guess it's now R.I.P
a.m.t....
I think you mean '97 :)
I've been here about that long too and I still check for new messages
every day. I'll probably leave it on my list just in case any other old
timers speak up. It sure was fun while it lasted...FrankMan, mouse, Tom,
Janelle, Cory...see you around the intarwebs :)
Same here. It's on my automated check list, so I catch anything that happens to
be posted. You never know, there may be another interesting discovery we'll
want to talk about... or another movie will be done, eventually.

- Bill
Ronnie Clark
2005-04-26 15:42:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Leary
Same here. It's on my automated check list, so I catch anything that happens to
be posted. You never know, there may be another interesting discovery we'll
want to talk about... or another movie will be done, eventually.
I bet none of you have, in the last 8 years, noticed, though, that they made
the mistake about "Hard-a-starboard", but then it turned left, which as we
all know is port, not starboard!

...Or should I not go there? :)
--
Ronnie
--
Have a great day...
...Have a Great Central day.
www.greatcentralrailway.com
Bill Leary
2005-04-26 20:21:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ronnie Clark
Post by Bill Leary
Same here. It's on my automated check list, so I catch anything that
happens to be posted. You never know, there may be another
interesting discovery we'll want to talk about... or another movie
will be done, eventually.
I bet none of you have, in the last 8 years, noticed, though, that they made
the mistake about "Hard-a-starboard", but then it turned left, which as we
all know is port, not starboard!
An order for "starboard" (right) was intended to turn the ship to port (left),
so that's correct.

Or are you talking about one of the movies depictions of which way the wheel was
turned?

There has been discussion about which way the wheel turned to execute that
order. Some have felt that the telemotor was still operated against the turn.
That is spin it right to turn left. Most, however, are pretty sure that it had
been rigged to turn in accordance with the ships desired movement. In both "A
Night to Remember" (1958) and "Titanic" (1997) the wheel is shown being turned
to the left. Thus, they both depict the "correct" turn, if you believe the
second theory, and they're both wrong if you believe the first.
Post by Ronnie Clark
...Or should I not go there? :)
If you wish.

- Bill
Ronnie Clark
2005-04-26 20:45:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Leary
An order for "starboard" (right) was intended to turn the ship to port (left),
so that's correct.
Sorry, Bill, just having a joke at the thousands of times a movie fan would
pop up and point out this "error" in 'Titanic'. :)
--
Ronnie
--
Have a great day...
...Have a Great Central day.
www.greatcentralrailway.com
Bill Leary
2005-04-26 22:17:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ronnie Clark
Sorry, Bill, just having a joke at the thousands of times a movie fan would
pop up and point out this "error" in 'Titanic'. :)
I thought it might be, especially since I remember your name.

On the other hand, I seem to recall someone who kept insisting (serously) that
this (the order itself) was incorrect in the movies.

My apologies for not remembering it wasn't you.

- Bill

Loading...